![]() There's really just not much more to say. That goes for the score, dialogue, superfluous character writing - almost everything beyond the crucial core. 'Silo' could have been a low-key, forthright, human interest thriller, but every bit of extra flair, intended to add greater sense of drama, only waters down what the film could have been. Instead we're also presented with glimpses at the lives of all the characters, back story, and the low-down on their various interpersonal histories and conflicts. A straightforward, plainspoken story of disaster and rescue would have been compelling, without any need for embellishment. The central narrative thrust is the strength of 'Silo,' and the movie would have greatly benefited from focusing purely on this aspect. Disagreements in how best to go about the procedure reflect a disparity of specific knowledge and lack of communication, elements which are undoubtedly real enough. We see steps undertaken to save the trapped boy, and the way it all becomes a community effort. In the depiction of the entrapment, and the rescue process, the movie feels in large part like a simple dramatization. ![]() To build a film based simply on that scenario is a curious notion, but the inherent drama is ripe for storytelling possibilities. ![]() Grain entrapment is a dire, deadly, urgent emergency, as illustrated in various films over the years but most of all documented in real life cases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |